When ALL is not ALL at all!
On 15th of December 2021, i news (dubbed as “The essential briefing”) reported a headline reading “Christmas lockdown: More than half of all adults would support firebreak, and 48% expect to change plans”
Note, that they state “all adults” in this headline.
Looking further down, you will see that the claims of this headline are based on a survey of only 1004 UK adults. The survey was conducted by Savanta Comres.
1004 adults in the UK, represents only 0.0015% of the UK population. Hardly “all adults”. The fact that “all adults” is used in the headline, regardless of the detail provided later in the article is significant. Studies have shown time and again that most people do not read beyond the headlines and this number is growing, particularly in the digital age when attention span is getting shorter and people rely more and more on soundbites. Our longing for “instant gratification” and “quick fixes” in a digital world where we are bombarded with information, means people are losing patience and rarely look beyond the headlines. Those headlines are represented online in the digital world as click-bait, where Big Tech and independent interest groups seek to shape opinions while making money.
We believe the media know this all too well and seek to shape the opinions of people using sensationalised headlines – like this one. This is propaganda
This article from i on 15th of December 2021, ties the rise of infections caused by the Omicron variant to the supposed support of firebreak.
Do you think there is a timely link between this spurious claim and the Government’s push for people to adopt vaccination and booster immunisations? Consider that according to the UK Health Security Agency (HSA), by November 30th 2021, 12 of the 22 cases of Covid Omicron variant are people who have been double vaccinated.
According to NHS UK, “There is a chance you might still get or spread COVD-19 even if you have a vaccine, so it’s important to follow advice about how to avoid catching and spreading COVD-19.
The definition of a vaccine (according to many sources) is “a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases…” The definition of immunity is “the ability of an organism to resist a particular infection or toxin by the action of specific antibodies or sensitised white blood cells.”
The COVID-19 “vaccine” doesn’t provide immunity according to NHS UK, because there is a chance that “vaccinated” people might still get or spread the virus. Why then is the Government and Mainstream Media (and therefore most of us) calling this a vaccine?
Words have power and when the wrong words are used, backed up by data that is not representative of the majority of the population, those words are very dangerous. When terms like “vaccine” are used for medications, when the meaning of the word is misrepresented or at best in still not determined, that is equally, if not more dangerous.
Do you believe that the Governments of this world are working with Mainstream Media to abuse the use of data to create words and language to deceive you? Because if you do, you are already living in a world where propaganda, misinformation and disinformation are being used more and more to shape your thoughts and your opinions.
Authoritarian governments have done this in the past – many have become tyrannical.